Files
crank/TASKS.md
T
2026-05-07 19:03:39 +00:00

6.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

TASKS

Current

feat/open-core-repo-boundary

Status: in_progress

Goal:

  • закрепить техническую границу между crank-community, crank-enterprise и crank-cloud.

Main code areas:

  • docs/commercial-boundaries.md
  • docs/module-decomposition.md
  • docs/development-rules.md
  • docs/implementation-plan.md
  • release scripts / Docker manifests / future packaging files

Implementation slices:

  1. Определить extension seams в public code.
  2. Подготовить отдельные delivery manifests для Community.
  3. Убрать из Community repo assumptions о размещении private code рядом с Community logic.
  4. Подготовить naming и packaging strategy для private repositories.
  5. После завершения seams и capability split остановиться на управленческом gate и создать:
    • public repository crank-community
    • private repository crank-enterprise
    • private repository crank-cloud Только после этого начинать физическое вынесение commercial code из текущего monorepo.

DoD:

  • можно объяснить, что именно публикуется как OSS, а что уходит в private delivery;
  • Community release path отделен от commercial release path;
  • документация не ссылается на удаленные review files.
  • момент создания 3 целевых repositories зафиксирован в плане как отдельный обязательный шаг, а не подразумевается неявно.

Verification:

  • docs consistency pass;
  • release checklist review.

Progress:

  • done:
    • public target repository crank-community now exists and can receive bootstrap templates once the remaining private repositories are created
    • gate for creating 3 target repositories is already documented before any physical commercial split
    • canonical Community deployment manifest and env template now live under deploy/community/*, and public deploy uses that manifest instead of the root compose file
    • CI, README, runtime/deploy smoke docs now point to deploy/community/* as the Community delivery source of truth
    • separate Community release checklist now exists and explicitly forbids treating future Enterprise/Cloud delivery as just another env on the same public manifest
    • explicit repository split map now defines what goes to crank-community, crank-enterprise, and crank-cloud
    • Community is now fixed as REST-only in product docs, capability model, backend validation, demo seed, and UI protocol expectations
    • bootstrap templates now exist for crank-community, crank-enterprise, and crank-cloud, including initial README and workflow skeletons
    • crank-runtime now has protocol feature seams, and the runtime crate compiles with --no-default-features as a REST-only base
  • pending:
    • next management gate is to create the remaining private target repositories:
      • crank-enterprise
      • crank-cloud
    • after all 3 repositories exist, move the prepared bootstrap templates into their roots before physical split starts

Planned

feat/commercial-machine-token-flow

Status: ready

Goal:

  • реализовать короткоживущие и одноразовые машинные токены как коммерческий auth contour, а не как Community stub.

Main code areas:

  • private enterprise/cloud token services
  • public contracts already fixed in:
    • crates/crank-core
    • apps/admin-api
    • apps/mcp-server
    • docs/agent-auth-model.md

Implementation slices:

  1. short-lived token issuance
  2. one-time token issuance
  3. replay guard / nonce coordination on top of cache layer
  4. runtime verification and policy enforcement by security_level
  5. capability-gated UI/admin flows for commercial editions

DoD:

  • replay guard is no longer a stub abstraction and is wired into a real token flow;
  • elevated/strict machine access works end-to-end in commercial contours;
  • Community remains on static agent keys only.

feat/enterprise-access-governance

Status: ready

Goal:

  • реализовать enterprise access layer вне Community scope.

Main code areas:

  • private enterprise services and crates
  • public contracts in:
    • docs/admin-api.md
    • docs/agent-auth-model.md
    • docs/product-editions.md

Implementation slices:

  1. SSO
  2. 2FA
  3. extended RBAC
  4. audit log
  5. enterprise admin flows in UI through capability gating

DoD:

  • governance features не живут как полумеры в Community;
  • enterprise access model согласован с public contracts.

feat/cloud-metering-control-plane

Status: ready

Goal:

  • подготовить hosted-редакцию как отдельный продуктовый контур.

Main code areas:

  • private cloud services
  • usage/metering integration points
  • docs/product-editions.md
  • docs/commercial-boundaries.md

Implementation slices:

  1. usage metering by workspace / agent / token;
  2. billing integration;
  3. hosted tenant controls;
  4. cloud operational tooling.

DoD:

  • Cloud edition не зависит от ручного учета usage;
  • hosted product surface согласован с feature matrix.

feat/release-protection-distribution

Status: ready

Goal:

  • подготовить безопасную поставку Community и коммерческих редакций.

Main code areas:

  • CI workflows
  • Dockerfiles
  • deployment manifests
  • release docs

Implementation slices:

  1. public GitHub release flow for Community;
  2. private registry flow for Enterprise;
  3. signed artifacts and provenance;
  4. release checklist for edition-specific packaging.

DoD:

  • Community публикуется из crank-community;
  • Enterprise и Cloud используют private delivery path;
  • коммерческий код не требуется публиковать в open source ради поставки.

feat/live-authenticated-staging-entry

Status: ready

Goal:

  • держать реальный staging/demo контур в состоянии, пригодном для демонстрации и регрессии.

Main code areas:

  • docs/demo-runbook.md
  • docs/deploy-and-staging-smoke.md
  • docs/authenticated-staging-pass.md
  • deployment workflows

Implementation slices:

  1. актуализировать demo user flow;
  2. прогнать authenticated staging pass;
  3. зафиксировать regressions и manual checks;
  4. синхронизировать deploy docs с реальным окружением.

DoD:

  • staging validation не зависит от локальных фикстур;
  • documentation matches deployed behavior;
  • demo flow reproducible on real environment.